the purpose of these article is not to call upon persecution of atheists / Darwinists or believers , but searching solution how escape of the persecution threat .
Unbroken , and Because the Point is Importantlier like a Grammar ,
grammar’s errors are just Cosmetic , Point is
Reader Justifying.
on start of my article is correct to anounceing that I haveNot academic legal education , BUT
algorithm of legal principial interpretation is better than of some (not all) judges , and about these fact I was many times ascertain.
the history of HUMAN legal system say :
The Highest Human Right is Right to Life。
at the moment when one the right found , found also his (excemptionally Death) unlimit.
and when he meet another one with
the same right to life , found that they two for the unlimit can bacame to conflict .
for prevent the conflict : of steal victuals , … final to killing and raping ,
community agreed the borders of
right to life = bans = laws .
First in verbaly style , later in writing .
The Modern Law Calling the Agreement
Social Contract .
Advantage of Right to Life is that is Hereditary , also with his borders/bans .
of course these bans if is social order can be modified. in majority people modify the hight of punishment of their violations .
Another advantage of Right to Life is analogy with else rights : right to marriage ,…, right to vote ,… right to faiths , … , (which are de_facto
grew up of space between the unlimit of right to life and the bans)
And now please Attention ;
by Right to Life is Grow : right to self determination . of course in new epoch law (international) in little bit more detailed conditions But still of the same Right to Life ; in antiquity in majority of cases , city states .
the citizens of every state thankfully hereditary principe of right to life inherited also the right to creating / to keep the states .
so in the same style how is possible modified the hight of the punishment of the violations the bans in the social contract is ; under right to life possible modified the borders of state .
unfortunately history showing that the borders of states was in majority of cases moved by wars .
in the antiquity times all anothers rights and bans went sideways and both sides was supported just by right to life , and on the end won right to life of stronger .
the losers which saved their lifes = right to life in majority of cases just for idea of parasitize by winners , so losers must accept the bans/laws of winners and in the legal sled sense they inherited the state of winners with borders created by winners .
Sometimes happened that losers was with inherited heritage (except right to life) discontended and go to rematch .
So state’s borders and their names was in history many times changed and all of these changes happened under right to life in
LEGAL SENSE .
little reminder : we at these times hasn`t the Geneva Convention and also today is
Possible (like every contract) the convention resign .
many modern people thankfully historical sources understand that we need almost pro_forma world’s Social Conract and inWrite the UN Charter , which is also for some people no problem to ignore …
for the UN Charter validation she was born “surprisingly” of right to life also with anothers rights + rights for in the future – defence war , and in the history just right to war including with prior sled of events .
so if have for example Italy under the UN charter borders , the Italy inherited state by Romulus and Remus including with all moves of borders and wars and changes .
AND NOW !
with Reader’s Permission I Arrive to the
Most Controversial Point in
HUMAN Legal History :
if all legal systems are created by Right to Life which is HERITABLE (and they are) how can two people writing together contract
when one inherited the right to life of Human being Adam and second inherited the Right to Life of Darwin`s monkey ???
🤔🤔🤔
of course no doubt that also animals have
right to life , but not in the same level like
a Human .
now we can for the moment Imagine that animals have the same level of right to life
like a human :
the dog which is not busy in police department or army or rescue service , or assistance service will have title for social financial help in the same hight like a human ,
in complicated traffic situation the driver which for don’t crash mother with baby on the crosswalk crash into female_dog with puppie on the crosswalk goes to same lawsuit trial like if crash into the mother with baby on crosswalk , rat’s exterminator will must escape to ilegallity like assassin etc …
The Element of Right to Life is in
Sacrosanctity of Heritage’s Chain .
If for exemple heir which inherited dynasty’s money and heritage was conditional with be family member , succesor was enjoyed of heritage 1 year but after was found that he is NOT a family member , so his heritage was a blocked , and the heritage’s principe is in
Inheritance money the same like
Inheritance of right to life .
Darwin’s Theory is Handicap not just for Some Believers , But Also for Human Legal System .
How to Superiore Darwin’s handicap for bellievers I inWrite HERE .
the Biggest Problem is :
exists some powerful people which think that many financial problems have solution in reduction of amount of people on
Planet Earth , and these contradiction between Darwin’s theory and Bellievers
in human legal system can
(even I hope Not = the reason of my articel)
put them chance how to make their volition .
Incorrect solution
cut the Heritage’s Chain of Right to Life in some year and inherit to “forward” of some date
for example 1945 ; so in these pseudosense Befor II. World War Czechoslovakia dont exist so cannot be after war recreated ,
or cut the chain in year 1800 ? So don’t exist Italy ,cut the chain in year 10 ? So don’t exist China , 500 befor Jesus Nazarenus ? So dont exist India , erlier ? So don’t exist Egypt , … 😏
just for reminder ; Israel is nominated Israel
for historical justness ; cronical of king Nabukadnesar II. is inwrite that he destroeyd the Israel and is inwrite also his aproximatly location , these is oldest historical mention about Jewish State , exist older mentions about Jews , but not about their state , for these reason is not their modern state nominated for exemple Judea .
The case of Israel and Czechoslovakia
very good showing that
cut the heritage chain of Right to Life in some date could be in human sense unlogical , but also in legal sense unjust .
can in future happened that archeology will found somewhere some mention of state which is older like a Babylon and progeny of his nation will want to rebuild the state , but if we cut the heritage chain , they will can’t .
many lawyers these problem ignore , in the same style like ignore romacatolic`s dressed fact that under vers Mat 13/38
We areNot all people brothers (is not about races or nations , but difference make capability of devil’s children raping and God’s Children uncapability raping even under threatment of death) or that
Mat 10/5,6 the “loving your enemy” which insult you ; change to smaller “targed” group .
they both (many lawyers+many dressed) start using elusion of no time for busy or arogance with arogant pfrase :
” i have a diplom and i say ; You havenot truth ”
of course withOut argument
and lawyer after lasts nail’s questions ;
if can chihuahua step into the heritage’s action of human ? or how can legaly shimpanz reference heritage box of bananas to human ? , running for bus even not long way have parked Lamborgini .
SOLUTION
If after … 100-200 … years arriving to family which dont believe into the Adam’s Principe some commando a_la´ hideous gestapo and they asking of who they inherited
the Right to Life ?
Please say to Your progeny to saying :
even i don’t now how is possible , if the first people created extraterrestrials ,
or they was created of some supernatural being , or they was inmaterialized of stars dust and water , but on the planet Earth was situated one Man and one Women and my family is their progeny .
P.S.: in the Bible are some Yods which on the first view are like “don’t would be” on their places , some of these (in Genezis) Yods Showing the Decades_ Centuries and Mileniums (else of the Yods Showing Final the Moment of My later much longer article remain Secret Things) Jumps to the Time before the Babylon tower fall = the times when MAJORITY of people talked just in the languAGE of intercejtions .
P.S.P.S.: no “scientist” of Darwin’s theory can saying when , where , and in which exemplar/exemplars of monkey was changed to the Human or under which concretly biological law and in how chemical proces inwrited to equation happened .
If somoene don’t seen the bb code whith link how to superiore the Darwin’s handicap for bellievers so the link is HERE .
I Have Between Atheists Some Friends and
Concretly They Are Good Beings so is Big Probability that Between Atheists Are More of Good Beings = God’s Children ;
One Reason More Why I Write These Article .
Copyright ©️ 2018 Peter Novacek All rights reserved .
embed downer for perseverers
